Send As SMS

Friday, October 06, 2006

Technology+Art=Wha??

During the introductory seminar, I personally have never heard of the term, "Victimless Meat", or turning living things into art. I believe turning meat into art can be controversial, but from how I saw it by critically thinking about this issue that if you are for this idea of turning meat into art, then you must be a kind of person that doesn't care for cows being manually slaughtered to art or a kind of person that do care about cows because they are living creatures and God gave them life for a purpose, could mean that you're a religious person too.

Using any kind of living things in my personal view calls for either an alert to the government of Canada or US or any country in the world that actually knows about this to give them a poke against this issue. I am 50% against and 50% for using living creatures as art. I am against it because its like killing a human being, I know that any creatures in this planet have a purpose like cows produces milk for everyone that needs it, and I am for it for scientific reasons. Zurr and Catts' Biology Art stated that they use any kind of cells and reproduce it for something similar, like taking out a cell from a cow and eventually making a patty out of that one lonely cell or similar to cloning. I would be totally 100% for it if that were what they actually would do with these cells in real life.

Now, I personally think about BioArt is that it visually looks good, but actually its not because we’re using real parts from real living creatures to use as art. There are other things that could be used as art, but using real meat and blood is something that’ll no doubt be a controversy.

1 Replies:

At 11:15, Blogger Unknown said...

The sentence structure seems repetitive and there are a lot of serious run-on sentences. I agree with your opinions though, except that BioArt should not be considered art.

Also, I noticed a lost tag in the middle of your entry. Is it supposedt to be there?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home